Consider Not Setting Goals in 2013

Consider Not Setting Goals in 2013

Consider Not Setting Goals in 2013

“Sophia, Daniel,” I yelled across the apartment at my seven-year-old and five-year-old who were playing together in their bedroom. “The school bus arrives in 10 minutes. Let’s see who can brush their teeth and get to the door first.”

They dashed towards the bathroom, giggling. Two minutes later, Daniel had won with Sophia a close second. I smiled at my own victory. I had achieved my goal of getting them to the door with their teeth brushed in record time.

Or did I?

Yes, they were at the door in time. But two minutes from start to finish meant that they didn’t brush their teeth very well, they definitely didn’t floss, and the bathroom was a mess.

We all know how important it is to have goals, right? And not just any goals, but stretch goals. Big Hairy Audacious Goals (or BHAGs, as they’re known to the inner goal-setting crowd).

It makes sense: if you don’t know specifically where you’re going, then you’ll never get there. And if you don’t set the bar high enough, you’ll never live up to your potential.

This is accepted common sense in the business world and it’s reinforced by research. Like that study done on the Harvard Business School class you may have heard of, in which only 3% of the graduating students wrote down clear goals. Twenty years later, those 3% were worth 10 times the worth of the rest of the class combined. Compelling, right?

It would be if it were true. But it isn’t. That study doesn’t exist. It’s pure urban myth.

Still, that’s just one specious story. Questioning the wisdom of setting stretch goals is like questioning the very foundation of business. We might debate which goals to set, or how to set them, but who would debate whether to set goals at all?

I’d like to.

It’s not that goals, by their nature, are bad. It’s just that they come with a number of side effects that suggest you may be better off without them.

The authors of a Harvard Business School working paper, Goals Gone Wild, reviewed a number of research studies related to goals and concluded that the upside of goal setting has been exaggerated and the downside, the “systematic harm caused by goal setting,” has been disregarded.

They identified clear side effects associated with goal setting, including “a narrow focus that neglects non-goal areas, a rise in unethical behavior, distorted risk preferences, corrosion of organizational culture, and reduced intrinsic motivation.”

Here are two of the examples of goals gone wild the authors described in their paper:

Sears set a productivity goal for their auto repair staff of bringing in $147 for every hour of work. Did this motivate employees? Sure. It motivated them to overcharge on a companywide basis.
Remember the Ford Pinto? A car that ignited when it was rear-ended? The Pinto resulted in 53 deaths and many more injuries because workers omitted safety checks in pursuit of Lee Iacocca’s BHAG goal of a car that would be “under 2000 pounds and under $2,000″ by 1970.
And here’s another, via the New York Times:
Ken O’Brien, the former New York Jets quarterback, was throwing too many interceptions. So he was given what seemed to be a pretty reasonable goal — fewer interceptions thrown — and penalized financially for every one. It worked. He threw fewer interceptions. But only because he threw fewer passes. His overall performance suffered.
It’s practically impossible to predict the negative side effects of a goal.

When we set goals, we’re taught to make them specific and measurable and time-bound. But it turns out that those characteristics are precisely the reasons goals can backfire. A specific, measurable, time-bound goal drives behavior that’s narrowly focused and often leads to either cheating or myopia. Yes, we often reach the goal, but at what cost?

So what can you do in the absence of goals? It’s still often necessary to drive toward achievements, especially in business. We need help setting direction and measuring progress. But maybe there’s a better way to achieve those things while sidestepping goals’ negative side effects.

I want to propose one: Instead of identifying goals, consider identifying areas of focus.

A goal defines an outcome you want to achieve; an area of focus establishes activities you want to spend your time doing. A goal is a result; an area of focus is a path. A goal points to a future you intend to reach; an area of focus settles you into the present.

A sales goal, for example, might name a revenue target or a specific number of new clients won. An operations goal might articulate a cost savings.

An area of focus in sales, on the other hand, might involve having lots of conversations with appropriate prospects. An operations area of focus might identify areas you want to explore for cost savings.

Obviously these aren’t mutually exclusive. You could have a goal and an area of focus. In fact, one could argue that you need both together — the goal specifies where you’re going and the area of focus describes how you plan to get there.

But there is a benefit to concentrating on an area of focus without a goal.

An area of focus taps into your intrinsic motivation, offers no stimulus or incentive to cheat or take unnecessary risks, leaves every positive possibility and opportunity open, and encourages collaboration while reducing corrosive competition. All while moving forward on the things you and your organization value most.

In other words, an area of focus offers all the advantages of a goal without the negative side effects.

How do you do it? It’s simple: identify the things you want to spend your time doing — or the things that you and your manager decide are the most valuable use of your time — and spend your time doing those things. The rest takes care of itself. I have found that five major things are about the limit before your efforts get diluted.

The key is to resist the temptation to identify the outcome you want to achieve. Leave that open and allow yourself to be pleasantly surprised. I’m not suggesting that this is easy to do. I never realized how goal-focused I was until I tried to stop focusing on goals. Without goals, I found it hard to trust that anything would get done at all.

But things got done. And in my experience, not only will you achieve at least as much as you would have if you had set goals, but you’ll enjoy the process far more, avoiding unnecessary stress and temptation.

In other words, if we focus on the tasks instead of the outcome, my kids will still get to the door on time, but they will have flossed, brushed thoroughly, and left the bathroom clean too.


Enjoyed this Post?

Recent Posts:

14 comments

add yours
  • Brad December 15, 2012 Reply

    When Leo Babauta of Zen Habits started talking about “no goals,” he could never convince me. Yesterday I was actually brainstorming goals for 2013. But I found your examples of failed goals really persuasive and your alternative of areas of focus interesting. Thanks, I’ll be re-approaching 2013 today with the framework of areas of focus!

  • kapil bhatia December 17, 2012 Reply

    I am reading 18 minutes and was struggling to find focus areas for me as I was overlapping “focus areas” with “goals”. This article helped me.

  • Vishal December 20, 2012 Reply

    Thank you so much!!!

  • Vishal December 20, 2012 Reply

    I always felt too much pressure while setting up goals because one , you never know sometimes how life unfolds and sometime , things are out of control and second , it made me feel so much pressurized with time bounds and third , the guilt of not accomplishing them in time and successfully . Your article changes whole vision and provides more effective way to live . Thanks again!!

  • Cindi December 21, 2012 Reply

    Love this! Feels freeing and fun….thanks for articulating so clearly what I’ve been dancing around for years! Great examples to drive it home.

  • Mariana Maddocks December 24, 2012 Reply

    Thank you… as this thinking has validated how I live my life.
    As an Executive Coach I advise my clients about being wary of setting New Years Resolutions and then making themselves “wrong” for not meeting them.
    Focusing on what where my passion leads me is satisfying and exciting and engages my “right brain”…allowing me to be creative.

  • Arto January 2, 2013 Reply

    Hi Peter!

    I just read your book 18 minutes. Awesome book! I read a LOT, and I have to admit I really enjoyed 18 minutes.

    I thought I might give you a quick tip here… You might want to put up a redirect from that peterbregman.com/18 address, that was on the book, to somewhere where the cheat sheets can be instantly found. Just so that people find what they’re looking for :)

    Have an awesome and successful year 2013, Peter!

    All the best,
    Arto

  • [...] the National Outdoor Leadership School who now coaches CEOs and other top executives. Bregman is not a fan of setting New Year’s Resolutions or other big goals. He says that commonly focus on a specific [...]

  • [...] perfect summary on the whole purpose/ sense of life subject, together with Peter Bregman’s brilliant post on living with no [...]

  • [...] منبع Like!0 Share and Enjoy [...]

  • [...] the National Outdoor Leadership School who now coaches CEOs and other top executives. Bregman is not a fan of setting New Year’s Resolutions or other big goals. He says that commonly focus on a specific [...]

  • Dan June 13, 2013 Reply

    If you’d like a tool for setting your goals, you can use this web application:

    Gtdagenda .com

    You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, and a calendar.
    Syncs with Evernote and Google Calendar, and also comes with mobile version, and Android and iPhone apps.

  • […] As you set out on your evolution I encourage you to look at your plan in much the same way. Let’s take losing weight as an example. The physical change we are hoping to create has many variables to it. Nutrition, sleep, hydration, exercise, stress etc can all contribute to our current physical states. So for us to make blanket statements like “I want to lose 25 pounds this year” we are only discussing the “signs and symptoms” not the cause. So the next logical step is to outline what it is going to take to lose 25 pounds. Changes to nutritional habits and exercising more will likely need to be a part of the equation. But go one step further. What drives your eating habits? Do you eat when you are stressed, depressed, bored? Does the lack of exercise stem from a lack of energy due to depression or poor sleep habits due to work related stress? My point here is that much like the physical conditions I see in the clinic, going into greater detail about the individual situation helps to understand more about why things are the way they are. For goal setting and true evolution it will be vital to have a deeper level of knowledge about the why so you can do what is necessary to truly evolve and not just resolve. I support everyone that talks to me about the plans for the New Year and hope that they all are successful in making the changes they are looking to make. If you are interested in an additional point of view regarding goal setting take a look at this 2013 article from Peter Bergman. […]

  • […] Bregman’s article on working to areas of focus rather than to goals. I’m always interested in learning about different approaches to […]

Leave a Comment


9 + = 16

Post